Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 07:24

Just in the last 5 years:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
7 Kirkland Items Members Say Are Better Than Anything at Target - Eat This Not That
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Tender Moment Nurse Mare Adopts Orphaned Foal As Her Own Has Us in Tears - Yahoo
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What caused the stock market to crash?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Why do people think Mirko is boring in My Hero Academia?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Woman suing Costco after alleged severe store-related injury - MyNorthwest.com
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Advice for trying GLP-1 drugs for weight loss from a doctor who's been there - NPR
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Eating More of These Foods May Lower Your Cancer Risk by 8%, New Study Suggests - EatingWell